Tuesday, April 29, 2008
Hiatus
With apologies to my loyal readers, I must put the Better-Faster-Cheaper blog on indefinite hiatus. Once I have a couple of professional issues in hand, we will resume our discussions. Thanks to everyone for your feedback. See you again soon.
Sunday, March 16, 2008
Hope
The final track on Nas's album, Hip Hop Is Dead, is called "Hope," and it allows for the faintest expectation that hip hop might actually rise again. The same is possible for Six Sigma. If we take good care of it, shed some of the baggage that has weighed us down, and focus on what's RIGHT about the method, there's a glimmer of hope that Six Sigma might still add value.
But how? Well, the Sudden Six Sigma approach - a simple, cost-effective and results-oriented methodology - retains Six Sigma's powerful focus on root cause analysis, data-driven decision making, strategic alignment and sustainable, continuous improvement, while emphasizing immediate impacts, the power of intuition and the often overlooked human aspects of effective transformation.
Adaptability and versatility is the key to preserving the vitality and potency of Six Sigma. While the training and experience of certified Six Sigma Master Black Belts, Black Belts and Green Belts holds the promise of tremendous value, we can't continue to apply the same hefty, burdensome and jargon-addled methodology to every business problem in every enterprise and every industry. We must not underestimate the power of common sense, intuition and, above all, a healthy sense of urgency.
If we're going to transform business and move forward competitively, we won't do it with overly academic and out-of-touch armies of paralyzed analysts. And we can't proceed under a banner of linear regression and chi squares. We must adopt a Sudden Six Sigma mindset. In the end, our mantra must only be:
Better. Faster. Cheaper.
Next time, we'll get into the details of the 6 Ds of the Sudden Six Sigma Better-Faster-Cheaper process.
Tuesday, January 8, 2008
Who Killed Six Sigma? - part two
Picking up where we left off, let's take a closer look at Six Sigma's cause of death and its killers. First, though, let's be clear. Malicious and murderous intent are not to blame for this death. In fact, organizations like GE who have been implicated in the discipline's demise had only the purest and most idealistic of intentions. We'll have to call it manslaughter. But how did it happen?
Well, as we discussed in an earlier post, multinationals like GE began applying the rigorous, data-intensive Six Sigma methodology to every available business problem. In some cases, this yielded some impressive wins. In many, many other cases, however, the toolkit proved too hefty, the methodology too complex, and the pace of change too glacial to make a real difference.
Before long, the Black Belts practicing Six Sigma within these organizations were seen as woefully out of touch with the reality of business. Six Sigma itself was soon viewed as a gargantuan, lumbering beast whose head was filled with eggheaded, unrealistic theories, esoteric acronyms and terminology, and a surplus of bureaucratic hoops to jump through.
Once Six Sigma began to look like an obstacle to rather than an agent of change, its vitality quickly slipped away. Business leaders distanced themselves from it, hiding their Green Belt certifications in a cabinet and looking toward the horizon for the next generation of agents of growth and change.
Those who were charged with carrying out Six Sigma's bidding, even as it lay on its death bed, took the usual paths of grief. Some soldiered numbly on in denial. Others angrily railed against the method's impending expiration and became deeply entrenched Six Sigma acolytes.
But let's not forget that the corporate world's best and brightest had been chosen to study, implement and guard Six Sigma, and with them lies the hope for the birth of something new, something that preserves the methodology's strengths, learns from the lessons of the past, and leads the way to fast-paced and meaningful change.
The mission is simple: to do business better, faster and cheaper. In the next post, we'll start to dig into what the future holds and how we might breathe new life into the world of process improvement.
Well, as we discussed in an earlier post, multinationals like GE began applying the rigorous, data-intensive Six Sigma methodology to every available business problem. In some cases, this yielded some impressive wins. In many, many other cases, however, the toolkit proved too hefty, the methodology too complex, and the pace of change too glacial to make a real difference.
Before long, the Black Belts practicing Six Sigma within these organizations were seen as woefully out of touch with the reality of business. Six Sigma itself was soon viewed as a gargantuan, lumbering beast whose head was filled with eggheaded, unrealistic theories, esoteric acronyms and terminology, and a surplus of bureaucratic hoops to jump through.
Once Six Sigma began to look like an obstacle to rather than an agent of change, its vitality quickly slipped away. Business leaders distanced themselves from it, hiding their Green Belt certifications in a cabinet and looking toward the horizon for the next generation of agents of growth and change.
Those who were charged with carrying out Six Sigma's bidding, even as it lay on its death bed, took the usual paths of grief. Some soldiered numbly on in denial. Others angrily railed against the method's impending expiration and became deeply entrenched Six Sigma acolytes.
But let's not forget that the corporate world's best and brightest had been chosen to study, implement and guard Six Sigma, and with them lies the hope for the birth of something new, something that preserves the methodology's strengths, learns from the lessons of the past, and leads the way to fast-paced and meaningful change.
The mission is simple: to do business better, faster and cheaper. In the next post, we'll start to dig into what the future holds and how we might breathe new life into the world of process improvement.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)